The Impact of VAR on the Essence of Football: A Critical Perspective from Holstein Kiel’s President, Steffen Schneekloth
Introduction
The introduction of Video Assistant Referees (VAR) into top-level football has sparked heated debate among fans, players, and football officials alike. While many argue that VAR has increased fairness and accuracy in decision-making, others lament its potential to stifle the game’s inherent emotions and spontaneity. Holstein Kiel’s President, Steffen Schneekloth, has emerged as a vocal critic of VAR in its current implementation, advocating for a reassessment of its role in the beautiful game.
Schneekloth’s Concerns: VAR Dilutes the Passion and Uncertainty
Schneekloth’s primary contention is that VAR, in its current form, detracts from the emotions and uncertainty that are intrinsic to football. He believes that the constant interruptions and lengthy reviews disrupt the flow of the game, diminishing the excitement and tension that fans crave.
Moreover, Schneekloth argues that the existence of VAR undermines the authority of on-field referees. He believes that referees should be empowered to make subjective decisions without the constant scrutiny of a remote video team. He maintains that certain incorrect calls are an unavoidable part of the game’s fabric and that they contribute to its unpredictability and charm.
A Call for a More Limited Role for VAR
Schneekloth proposes a more limited role for VAR, suggesting that it should only be used in instances where objective technological tools, such as goal-line technology or calibrated lines for offside decisions, can provide an irrefutable and unbiased verdict. He argues that the reliance on VAR for subjective or borderline calls not only delays the game but also introduces an element of uncertainty into the decision-making process.
Critique of Explanation Broadcasts: An Unnecessary Burden
Schneekloth also criticizes the recent move to broadcast VAR decisions and explanations to fans in the stadium during matches. He believes that this further complicates the situation, potentially adding to the referee’s stress levels and interrupting the game’s natural rhythm.
Drawing Parallels to American Football: A Misguided Comparison
Schneekloth finds comparisons between VAR in football and video replay in American football to be misleading. He highlights that American football employs a significant number of on-field officials who can consult with each other and calmly review video replays, whereas football referees have to manage the physical demands of the game while simultaneously communicating with their team and the VAR team. He argues that the pressure and volatility of a fast-paced football match make it unrealistic to expect referees to provide detailed explanations of VAR decisions in real-time.
Conclusion: Rethinking VAR’s Place
In conclusion, Steffen Schneekloth’s perspective on VAR challenges its widespread acceptance as a necessary evil in modern football. He argues that VAR, in its current implementation, detracts from the game’s fundamental qualities of excitement, uncertainty, and player empowerment. Schneekloth advocates for a reassessment of VAR’s role, proposing a more limited application that prioritizes objective decision-making and minimizes disruption to the flow of the game. Only by embracing a more nuanced and balanced approach can we ensure that the beautiful game retains its captivating essence for generations to come.
