Okay, here’s a significantly expanded and rewritten version of the article, formatted with Markdown. I’ve focused on adding depth, analysis, and exploring potential explanations for the perceived differences in media coverage.

The Curious Case of the Disappearing Concern: Trump’s Cognitive Stumbles and the Missing Media Frenzy

For years, a relentless chorus of voices, often amplified by right-leaning media outlets, decried what they perceived as then-President Joe Biden’s "mental decline." Every stumble, every misspoken word, every perceived moment of confusion was dissected and magnified, presented as irrefutable evidence of his unfitness for office. Yet, as former President Donald Trump, at the age of 78, exhibits increasingly bizarre and incoherent behavior, the outrage seems muted, the media scrutiny curiously selective.

Let’s examine some recent examples. In an interview with Time magazine, Trump’s responses raised eyebrows, to say the least. When asked about John Adams’ famous quote about a government ruled by laws, not men, Trump’s immediate response was to ask, "John Adams said that? Where was the painting?" This initial lack of comprehension, followed by confusion about the physical location of the portrait, suggests a troubling disconnect.

His comments on border security were equally perplexing. Trump claimed to have "completed the wall," yet simultaneously asserted that he "wanted to build additional" sections because it was "working so well." The reality, of course, is that while Trump added roughly 458 miles of barrier along the U.S.-Mexico border during his presidency, a significant portion of that involved replacing or reinforcing existing structures. The claim of complete construction followed by a need for more is a logical contradiction, casting doubt on the clarity of his thought process.

The Time interview continued with a particularly revealing exchange. When the interviewer reminded Trump that they had spoken to Biden the previous year, Trump’s initial reaction was a simple "Huh?" After being reminded of the interview, he inquired about Biden’s performance, ultimately declaring, "He didn’t do well." However, when the interviewer suggested Trump read the interview himself, Trump claimed to have already done so – a claim that seems highly dubious given his initial surprise at the interview’s existence.

Beyond formal interviews, Trump’s public appearances have also fueled concerns. Aboard Air Force One, when informed about a car bombing in Moscow that killed a Russian general, Trump’s response was, "Who killed what?" This apparent lack of awareness, followed by a request for the location of the incident despite it having just been stated, is deeply unsettling.

These incidents, while individually concerning, paint a broader picture of a man who appears increasingly detached from reality, prone to rambling, and frequently incoherent.

Consider his response to the Supreme Court’s unanimous decision requiring the Trump administration to bring Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a wrongfully deported man, back to the United States. Trump dismissed the ruling, claiming it was about something "entirely different," a statement demonstrably false.

Even more troubling is the case of the doctored photo used to falsely link Abrego Garcia to the MS-13 gang. Despite clear evidence that the "MS13" tattoos were digitally added to the image, Trump continues to insist they are real, even confronting ABC News’ Terry Moran about it during an interview. The insistence on promoting a blatant falsehood, even when confronted with irrefutable proof, raises serious questions about Trump’s grasp on reality and his willingness to distort the truth.

His recent comments regarding imaginary riots in Harlem protesting Harvard University, combined with the non sequitur about his "very high Black vote," further underscore this unsettling trend. The question was about Harvard, not Harlem, and the bizarre claim about riots protesting the university has no basis in reality.

Trump’s Truth Social posts are often even more alarming, filled with unhinged rants and bizarre accusations. The Easter message quoted in the original article, with its hyperbolic claims about "Radical Left Lunatics" and "Murderers, Drug Lords, Dangerous Prisoners," reads like the unhinged ravings of someone deeply disconnected from reality.

So, where is the media outrage? Where are the endless hours of cable news coverage? Why isn’t The New York Times dedicating extensive resources to investigating these incidents?

The stark contrast in media coverage between Biden’s perceived cognitive lapses and Trump’s increasingly bizarre behavior is difficult to ignore. Several potential explanations exist.

One possibility is the "normalization" of Trump’s behavior. After years of witnessing his unconventional style and often outrageous statements, the media may have become desensitized, viewing his incoherence as simply "Trump being Trump." This normalization, however, is dangerous, as it allows potentially serious cognitive issues to be dismissed as mere personality quirks.

Another factor could be the political calculation. Some media outlets may be hesitant to aggressively scrutinize Trump’s mental state for fear of alienating his supporters or being accused of political bias. The fear of being labeled "fake news" or "anti-Trump" can create a chilling effect on investigative journalism.

Furthermore, there’s the issue of what some might call "bothsidesism," a journalistic tendency to present both sides of an issue as equally valid, even when one side is demonstrably false. This approach can lead to a downplaying of Trump’s cognitive issues in an attempt to appear impartial, even if it means ignoring or minimizing clear evidence of decline.

Finally, it’s possible that some media outlets are deliberately ignoring Trump’s cognitive issues because they believe it benefits their political agenda. By portraying him as a strong and decisive leader, they can appeal to their base and further their own political goals.

Whatever the reasons, the lack of sustained and critical media scrutiny of Trump’s cognitive abilities is a disservice to the public. Voters deserve to be fully informed about the mental and physical health of those seeking the highest office in the land. The relative silence on Trump’s increasingly concerning behavior raises serious questions about media objectivity and the potential for political bias to influence news coverage. The future of the country could well depend on whether the media finally finds the courage to ask the tough questions and report the truth, regardless of the political consequences. Dismissing these concerns as mere personality quirks or "Trump being Trump" is not only irresponsible, but potentially dangerous.