Moab Grapples with Tourism Decline Amidst Federal Cuts and Political Tensions

Moab, Utah, a town celebrated for its stunning desert landscapes and proximity to natural wonders like Arches and Canyonlands National Parks, is facing a challenging season as a confluence of factors impacts its tourism industry. Traditionally bustling with visitors from across the globe, particularly Canadians drawn to the outdoor recreation opportunities, the town is experiencing a noticeable decline in tourist numbers, raising concerns among local businesses and residents.

The slump is attributed to several interwoven issues, including anxieties surrounding President Donald Trump’s policies, federal job cuts impacting park services, and lingering concerns from the COVID-19 pandemic. While some welcome the prospect of a reduced federal presence in the region, many fear the consequences of understaffed parks and the potential damage to Moab’s economy.

Stephen Krause, a Canadian tourist from Alberta, echoed the sentiment of many potential visitors. He observed the absence of familiar faces and vehicles, noting that many Canadians who frequent Moab are staying home this year. Businesses along Main Street report a similar trend, citing a significant drop in Canadian tourists who are reportedly deterred by Trump’s tariff plans and remarks about Canada’s status.

Moreover, American visitors are also expressing apprehension, with cancellations and concerns arising from federal job cuts at nearby Arches and Canyonlands National Parks. These parks, which attract 3.6 million visitors annually, are essential to Moab’s economy, and any perceived decline in their upkeep or accessibility could have a detrimental impact.

Lorenzo McGregor, co-owner of Tex’s Riverways, a business that guides canoeists and backpackers down the Colorado River into Canyonlands, reports a steady stream of cancellations from Canadian visitors citing Trump’s policies. He estimates losses of around $10,000 already and is preparing to adapt his business operations if the situation persists.

The federal job cuts, estimated at approximately 10,000 in Utah, have sparked debate within the community. While some hope these cuts will lead to a reduction in federal oversight and greater local control over public lands, others fear the consequences for the national parks. Concerns range from inadequate maintenance and dirty restrooms to increased traffic congestion around popular attractions like Hells Revenge and the Whole Enchilada trails.

Advocates worry that understaffed parks will struggle to maintain their natural beauty and provide necessary services to visitors. They fear that unchecked visitation could lead to environmental damage and a decline in the overall park experience.

On the other hand, some residents and business owners welcome the cuts, viewing them as a necessary step towards reducing the federal government’s influence in the region. They argue that federal regulations and oversight stifle private development and energy production, hindering economic growth. They advocate for greater access to public lands for off-road vehicles and other recreational activities, which they see as crucial to Moab’s economy.

The complex relationship between Moab and the federal government dates back to the uranium boom of the mid-20th century. The town’s economy was initially driven by uranium mining, with the federal government being the sole purchaser of the extracted element. Many of the roads built during this era have since become popular off-road trails, highlighting the area’s rich history and its connection to public lands.

However, the debate over land management remains a contentious issue. Utah has long chafed under federal control, with the government owning approximately 68% of the state’s land. Proposals to transfer federal land to state control or sell it off for development have been periodically floated, reflecting the ongoing tension between local desires and federal policies.

Despite the political divisions, there is a general consensus on the need for government efficiency. McGregor, for example, acknowledges the need for streamlining paperwork and reducing unnecessary oversight. However, he questions whether Trump’s approach of sweeping cuts is the most effective way to achieve this goal. He cites his own experience with the Park Service concessionaire permit, which requires him to purchase a permit for each boat launch, even though his overall permit already regulates the frequency of launches.

The tourism slump has also revived the debate over diversifying Moab’s economy. While the town has historically relied on tourism, particularly related to outdoor recreation, some argue that a broader economic base is needed to ensure long-term stability. They point to the potential for development and energy production as alternative sources of revenue.

Ashley Korenblat, president of the Moab Chamber of Commerce, acknowledges the impact of the federal cuts on the tourism industry. Her own recreation consulting business has lost a significant booking from Canadian customers due to Trump’s policies. She worries about the potential for further cancellations and the overall impact on the local economy.

Korenblat also highlights the potential for reduced services and a decline in the park experience due to understaffing. She fears that tourists may be deterred from visiting if they perceive the parks to be poorly maintained or lacking in essential amenities. Kursat Gokalp, owner of the Nuclear Bean Coffee Co. food truck, echoes these concerns, noting that a lack of enforcement and ranger presence could lead to increased littering and damage to the parks, ultimately discouraging visitors.

Despite the uncertainty, Moab remains a resilient community with a strong connection to its natural surroundings. The town is actively working to adapt to the changing circumstances and promote its unique attractions to a wider audience.

Steven Allred, co-owner of Moab Tour Company, expresses hope that the current challenges will be short-lived. He acknowledges the potential for misperceptions about park closures and the impact on tourism. He emphasizes the importance of foresight and careful planning to ensure the long-term sustainability of Moab’s economy.

Inside Arches National Park, the immediate impact of the federal cuts is not immediately apparent. The park is preparing to implement a timed entry system later this year, but for now, the visitor center remains open, and workers are cleaning the restrooms and grading the roads. However, the absence of uniformed rangers on patrol raises concerns about park safety and security.

Visitors to Arches, like Jeannine Acantilado and Dr. Steven Wolinsky from Phoenix, express their appreciation for the National Park system and its affordability. However, they also worry about the potential impact of the cuts on park maintenance and safety. Wolinsky, a cardiologist, reflects on his recent visit to Zion National Park, praising the value and efficiency of the park system. He hopes that the current challenges will not diminish the quality of the visitor experience.

Moab is at a crossroads. The town’s future will depend on its ability to navigate the complex challenges of federal policies, economic diversification, and responsible land management. While the immediate outlook may be uncertain, the community’s resilience and its commitment to preserving its natural treasures offer hope for a brighter future.